# Automattic's 33-Hour Coup, and can AI labs police themselves?

Published: 2026-09-18 · Updated: 2026-09-18 · Category: Regulation

Source page: https://www.sipply.dev/story/automattics-33-hour-coup-and-can-ai-labs-police-themselves-5a39274a · 中文: https://www.sipply.dev/zh/story/automattics-33-hour-coup-and-can-ai-labs-police-themselves-5a39274a

## Summary

In recent discussions surrounding AI safety and governance, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, has put forth a proposal aimed at managing AI development through the establishment of independent safety evaluators and fostering collaboration among AI labs in democratic nations. This initiative comes in response to growing concerns about the rapid pace of AI advancements and the potential risks they pose. While the proposal has received support from some industry leaders, it has also faced criticism, highlighting the complexities of regulating AI effectively. Concurrently, Automattic experienced a brief boardroom coup that may increase Matt Mullenweg's influence within the company, raising questions about leadership stability in tech firms amidst these broader discussions on AI governance.

## Key takeaways

- Dario Amodei's proposal emphasizes the need for independent safety evaluators in AI development.
- The initiative aims to foster collaboration among AI labs to ensure responsible advancement of technology.
- Automattic's internal leadership changes reflect the dynamic nature of tech companies during critical discussions about AI regulation.

## Why it matters

The push for independent safety evaluators in AI development signifies a crucial step towards addressing the ethical and safety concerns associated with rapidly evolving technologies. This could lead to more robust frameworks for AI governance.

- **Product managers:** For product managers, understanding the implications of AI governance initiatives is essential for aligning product strategies with emerging regulatory standards and ensuring that products are developed responsibly.
- **Developers:** Developers should be aware of the evolving landscape of AI regulation, as it may impact development practices and the tools they use, necessitating a focus on safety and ethical considerations in their work.
- **Students and job seekers:** Students and job-seekers in tech should recognize the importance of AI governance discussions, as knowledge in this area may enhance their employability and prepare them for future roles in a rapidly changing industry.

## Sources

- [Automattic's 33-Hour Coup, and can AI labs police themselves?](https://techcrunch.com/podcast/automattics-33-hour-coup-and-can-ai-labs-police-themselves) (TechCrunch AI, 2026-09-18)
- [Dario Amodei and other AI leaders want to 'Pace the Frontier' but…how?](https://techcrunch.com/video/dario-amodei-and-other-ai-leaders-want-to-pace-the-frontier-buthow) (TechCrunch AI, 2026-09-18)

## 中文

### Automattic的33小时政变，以及AI实验室能否自我监管？

在最近关于AI安全和治理的讨论中，Anthropic的首席执行官Dario Amodei提出了一项提案，旨在通过建立独立的安全评估机构和促进民主国家AI实验室之间的合作来管理AI发展。这一倡议是对AI快速发展的担忧和潜在风险的回应。尽管该提案得到了部分行业领袖的支持，但也面临批评，突显出有效监管AI的复杂性。同时，Automattic经历了一次短暂的董事会政变，这可能增加Matt Mullenweg在公司内的影响力，引发了关于科技公司领导稳定性的问题，尤其是在关于AI治理的广泛讨论中。

**要点：**

- Dario Amodei的提案强调了在AI发展中需要独立的安全评估机构。
- 该倡议旨在促进AI实验室之间的合作，以确保技术的负责任发展。
- Automattic的内部领导变动反映了科技公司在关于AI监管的关键讨论中的动态特性。

**为什么重要：** 推动在AI发展中建立独立的安全评估机构，标志着解决与快速发展的技术相关的伦理和安全问题的重要一步。这可能导致更强有力的AI治理框架。

---
Sipply: Sip AI News Simply. https://www.sipply.dev