# Anthropic and OpenAI want to embed safety evaluators. Will they really be independent?

Published: 2026-09-16 · Updated: 2026-09-16 · Category: Safety

Source page: https://www.sipply.dev/story/anthropic-and-openai-want-to-embed-safety-evaluators-will-3580c4b1 · 中文: https://www.sipply.dev/zh/story/anthropic-and-openai-want-to-embed-safety-evaluators-will-3580c4b1

## Summary

Anthropic and OpenAI have announced plans to integrate independent third-party evaluators into their organizations to enhance AI safety and alignment. This initiative is designed to promote greater transparency and accountability in the development of AI technologies. However, the success of this approach hinges on the true independence of these evaluators and their ability to access comprehensive information regarding the AI systems being assessed. The proposal raises important questions about how effectively these evaluators can operate without potential conflicts of interest and whether they will have the necessary resources to conduct thorough evaluations.

## Key takeaways

- Anthropic and OpenAI are taking steps to improve AI safety through independent evaluations.
- The effectiveness of these safety evaluators will depend on their independence and access to information.
- The initiative highlights ongoing concerns about transparency and accountability in AI development.

## Why it matters

This initiative represents a significant step towards ensuring that AI systems are developed responsibly and ethically, addressing public concerns over safety and alignment.

- **Product managers:** For product managers, this move underscores the importance of integrating safety measures into product development processes, potentially influencing product design and compliance strategies.
- **Developers:** Developers and engineers should be aware that these safety evaluations may introduce new requirements and standards, impacting how they build and test AI systems.
- **Students and job seekers:** For students and job-seekers, understanding the importance of safety in AI development can provide valuable insights into industry trends and potential career opportunities in AI ethics and compliance.

## Sources

- [Anthropic and OpenAI want to embed safety evaluators. Will they really be independent?](https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/16/anthropic-and-openai-want-to-embed-safety-evaluators-will-they-really-be-independent) (TechCrunch AI, 2026-09-16)

## 中文

### Anthropic 和 OpenAI 希望嵌入安全评估者。他们真的会独立吗？

Anthropic 和 OpenAI 宣布计划将独立的第三方评估者整合到他们的组织中，以增强 AI 安全性和对齐性。该倡议旨在促进 AI 技术开发中的更大透明度和问责制。然而，这种方法的成功取决于这些评估者的真正独立性以及他们获取被评估 AI 系统的全面信息的能力。该提案提出了关于这些评估者在没有潜在利益冲突的情况下能否有效运作以及他们是否拥有进行全面评估所需资源的重要问题。

**要点：**

- Anthropic 和 OpenAI 正在通过独立评估来改善 AI 安全性。
- 这些安全评估者的有效性将取决于他们的独立性和信息获取能力。
- 该倡议突显了 AI 开发中对透明度和问责制的持续关注。

**为什么重要：** 该倡议代表了确保 AI 系统负责任和伦理开发的重要一步，解决了公众对安全性和对齐性的担忧。

---
Sipply: Sip AI News Simply. https://www.sipply.dev